It can sometimes kind of go downhill from there, however.
Among the many, many products and services – supplements, injections, adjustments, magnetizers, light machines, movers, shakers, etc., etc. – that have come along with the rise of “performance horse medicine” is performance horse dentistry. Otherwise stated, it may be asserted that for a horse to perform at his best, it may be necessary to grind, cut, shave, or otherwise “equilibrate” a horse’s mouth to ensure that it can run, jump, piaffe, cut, or slide to the best of his ability. On some level, I suppose, this makes some sense, I mean, it wouldn’t be a good thing for a horse to try to perform with a tooth that was causing him pain because that tooth was broken or infected, to name just one example. But the whole idea of “performance horse” dentistry as it is often marketed to horse owners begs to be examined a bit. Let’s do it.

See what a difference good dental care can make?
Right off the bat, I might note that, when it comes to other athletes, say, basketball players, the care of the teeth is apparently entrusted to regular old run of the mill dentists. That is, at least to my knowledge, there aren’t any human dental specialists who assert that their particular method of, say, scaling teeth, or filling cavities, is going to help someone make more three-pointers or rebound with any greater aplomb; when it comes to rebounding, for example, you can’t polish enough enamel to get someone to be 7 feet tall. And while I digress a bit (not uncommon for me, to be sure), it does seem to me that whether or not a horse is a “performance” horse or one that just meanders around burning hay, waiting for the occasional opportunity to shuffle absent-mindedly along the trail, since horse teeth are horse teeth, just about anyone with the skill set, training, and inclination should be able to work on a horse’s mouth, at least when it comes to “routine” care.
From a historical perspective, “performance horse” recommendations have changed a lot. Take, for example, three procedures that used to be very commonly advocated. First is cutting the canine teeth. Second is the “bit seat.” Third are pulling the wolf teeth. I could go on for some time about each procedure, but there’s only so much that people are willing to read. Let’s suffice it to say that during the course of my career, each of these procedures has gone through a period of time where it was enthusiastically advocated: at conferences, seminars, wet labs, and such. I read about them, I learned about them, and, in some cases, I even did them. I just couldn’t tell any difference in how the horses did.
The only way I can make sense out of this is that, at least when it comes to these three procedures for performance horses, it probably doesn’t make any difference. I mean, if you eagerly do something, and then later, you just as eagerly avoid it, and there’s absolutely no change, it’s pretty hard to assert that the something you did was ever important. In fact, when it comes to medicine, and history, there are a lot of such examples. But this article is about performance horse dentistry, so let’s move on.
ASIDE: I have always wondered why horses are willing to put up with dental interventions: heck, all sorts of interventions.
Horse: “OK – I’m not really sure what you’re doing, but OK.”
Horse if if were me: Bite, strike, kick, run, tear down the barn. That, I understand.
Anyway, to complete the scientific circle, you’d want to repeat any study that you did. That is, you’d want to confirm the results of one study with another study. If both studies showed the same thing, you’d have more confidence in what you’re seeing. When it comes to performance horse dentistry, that’s just been done.

Franches-Montagnes horses, doing an impression of many other horse breeds
Recently, Swiss investigators looked at 38 Franches-Montagnes stallions (also known as Freibergers, which, by the way, is a breed that has been around since 1619).
ANOTHER ASIDE: I have never seen one of these. Here’s a picture.
When it comes to scientific confirmation, this is not the first good study to come to this conclusion. In 2006, in Canada, riders couldn’t tell the difference between 11 horses that got “occlusal equilibration” and 5 that didn’t. Dressage test scores and movements didn’t get better on horses after their teeth were filed down.
LAST ASIDE: I have no idea why the investigations are being done on dressage horses, but that’s the way it is. Still – and to be frank – as picky as dressage riders can be, you’d think if there were a difference, they might be the ones to notice, particularly the pros.
And as long as we’re exploding myths, there’s one other thing. If you get a gift horse, it’s actually OK to look it in its mouth. Just don’t do anything unless he needs it.